食品伙伴網(wǎng)訊  據(jù)歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）消息，2019年10月9日，歐盟食品安全局就活性物質(zhì)大伏革菌（Phlebiopsis gigantea）菌株VRA 1835, VRA 1984 和FOC PG 410.3的農(nóng)藥風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估發(fā)布同行評(píng)審。

 

　　愛(ài)沙尼亞和法國(guó)對(duì)活性物質(zhì)進(jìn)行了初期風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估。之后，歐盟食品安全局審查了初期風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估報(bào)告。歐盟食品安全局提出了適用于監(jiān)管風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估的可靠端點(diǎn)，列出了監(jiān)管框架要求的缺失信息。

 

　　部分原文報(bào)道如下：

 

　　The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Estonia and co‐rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation （EU） No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation （EU） No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of Phlebiopsis gigantea strains VRA 1835, VRA 1984 and FOC PG 410.3 as a fungicide （field use） on conifer forests: pine, spruce, larch. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

 

　　本文由食品伙伴網(wǎng)食品資訊中心編輯，供網(wǎng)友參考，歡迎轉(zhuǎn)載，轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處！有任何疑問(wèn)，請(qǐng)聯(lián)系news@foodmate.net。